Tuesday, May 19, 2009

NB’s Health Minister promotes anti-abortion stance at rally, should resign for conflict of interest

May 19, 2009

NB’s Health Minister Must Resign

As elected official, Michael Murphy is imposing his religious views and failing to enforce federal laws

FREDERICTON – A national pro-choice group is demanding the resignation of New Brunswick’s health minister Michael Murphy, after he promoted his religious views against abortion at an anti-choice rally in New Brunswick last week. Speaking in his official capacity, Murphy said that because of his personal anti-abortion views, he’s not “entirely comfortable” with administering the provincial law that allows funded abortions at New Brunswick hospitals.

“After Murphy resigns, he’s free to preach at all the anti-abortion rallies he wants,” said Joyce Arthur, Coordinator of the Abortion Rights Coalition of Canada. “But as an elected official with a portfolio, it’s inappropriate for Murphy to publicize a direct conflict between his personal religious views and his ministerial duties. He risks losing the confidence of voters, not to mention the thousands of women in New Brunswick who’ve had or may need abortion care.”

“Actually, if Murphy thinks it’s his duty to enforce a law he doesn’t like, why doesn’t he enforce our Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Canada Health Act instead?” asked Peggy Cooke, an ARCC spokesperson based in Fredericton. “New Brunswick’s law is discriminatory and unconstitutional. We are the only province in Canada that forces women through unnecessary hoops to get approval, which results in delays, increased medical risk, and hardship.” (The Medical Services Payment Act states that Medicare will fund abortions in hospitals only if two doctors agree the procedure is medically necessary.) “These restrictions violate women’s Charter rights and the Supreme Court Morgentaler decision of 1988,” said Cooke. “Also, women who can’t wait are forced to pay out of pocket for an abortion at the Morgentaler Clinic. This contravenes the Canada Health Act because it discriminates against women, especially those who can’t afford to go to the clinic.”

Arthur pointed out that no doctor needs to decide whether an abortion is medically necessary, because all abortions are deemed medically necessary under the Canada Health Act, whether they’re done at a hospital or clinic. “There’s absolutely no difference between the abortions done at New Brunswick hospitals and those done at the Morgentaler Clinic in Fredericton,” Arthur said. “The only reason most women end up paying for an abortion at the clinic, is because hospitals don’t have nearly enough operating room access or abortion providers.”

“Murphy’s duty as Health Minister is to keep his personal views to himself when they conflict with his duties, and to repeal the discriminatory New Brunswick regulation so women can access abortion without paying,” Cooke concluded. “If he can’t do that, he must resign.”

Issued by Abortion Rights Coalition of Canada
http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/home.html

Labels: , , ,

Friday, March 13, 2009

Judy Rebick Book Launch at UNB: March 27!

Journalist, Writer, and Activist Judy Rebick will be at UNB on the afternoon of Friday, March 27th, at 4:00 pm as a guest of Women's Studies and Political Science. She is touring Canada to launch her new book, published this week, called Transforming Power: From the Personal to the Political".

Location: Chancellor's Room, Wu Centre, UNB, Fredericton
Time: 4:00 pm
Date: Friday, March 27th
There will be a short reception after her talk. Her book will be for sale.
The event is free and open to the public.



Judy Rebick is a well-known social justice activist, educator , writer, and speaker. She currently holds the Sam Gindin Chair in Social Justice and Democracy at Ryerson University.

Judy is founder of rabble.ca, Canada’s most popular independent online news and discussion site and the author of several books and articles, most recently Ten Thousand Roses: The Making of a Feminist Revolution (Penguin 2005). Her other books are Imagine Democracy (Stoddard 2000) and Politically Speaking (Douglas & McIntyre 1996).


In her new book, "Transforming Power: From the Personal to the Political", veteran activist Judy Rebick explains how globalization and mass communication technology are revolutionizing our understanding of power and producing profound new ideas about social and political life. Whether it’s the election of President Obama, the rise of democracy in Bolivia, or the success of Wikipedia, it’s the process that’s key: bringing communities of people together to produce something new; building a movement from the bottom up; sharing experience, knowledge and wisdom; emphasizing co-operation and consensus over confrontation and political partisanship.

Meaningful response to the environmental crisis and social injustice requires substantial, sustainable change at every level, which can only come through building power from the grass roots, from the people most impacted. In Transforming Power we discover the ideas, the people and the practices that can provide the paths to the change we need.

Visit her website: Transforming Power for more info on the book and Judy herself.


Labels: , , , ,

Wednesday, March 11, 2009

Action Needed: Pay Equity. Fight Bill C-10.

Please contact a Senator in your area:


Don't use the budget bill to eliminate pay equity!

If Bill C-10 passes it will…
• Allow the Conservative Government to remove pay equity complaints from the Canadian Human Rights Commission.

“Canadian Human Rights Commission does not have
jurisdiction to deal with pay equity complaints in the
public service.” (Excerpt Bill C-10)

• Force individual women to make pay equity claims without any
support from their Union, and would impose a $50,000 fine on
Unions for assisting them.

“The bargaining agent…is strictly forbidden to
encourage or assist her in filing a complaint, and is
liable to a $50,000 fine if it does.” (Excerpt Bill C-10)

• Allow Private sector workers to continue to complain and defend themselves on paydiscrimination through the Canadian Human Rights Commission while Public sector workers will no longer have that option.

I am asking you as one of the N.B. senators to vote to remove the Public Sector
Equitable Compensation Act from Bill C-10. Pay Equity is a Human Right and Human
Rights are not negotiable!

Name: ____________________________
Signature: ________________________
Mailing address:____________________
__________________________________
___________



List of New Brunswick Senators:
Listes des Sénateurs et Sénatrices du N.-B.


Name/Nom Affiliation(Parti)

Bryden, John G. LIB (NB)
damphh@sen.parl.gc.ca
The Senate of Canada, Ottawa, Ont., KlA 0A4
Tel : 613-947-7305
Fax 613-947-7307

Corbin, Eymard G. LIB (Grand-Sault)
The Senate of Canada, Ottawa, Ont. K1A 0A4
Tel: 613-996-8485
Fax: 613-995-8172

Day, Joseph A. LIB (Saint John-Kennebecasis)
dayja@sen.parl.gc.ca
The Senate of Canada, Ottawa, Ont. K1A 0A4
Tel: 613-992-0833
Fax: 613-992-1175

Kinsella, Noël A. CONS (Fredericton-York-Sunbury)
kinsen@sen.parl.gc.ca
The Senate of Canada, Ottawa, Ont. K1A 0A4
Tel: 613-992-4416
Fax: 613-992-9772

Losier-Cool, Rose-Marie LIB (Tracadie)
losier@sen.parl.gc.ca
The Senate of Canada, Ottawa, Ont. K1A 0A4
Honorary Co-Chair of the New Brunswick Coalition for Pay Equity.
• co-présidente honoraire de la Coalition pour l’équité salariale du Nouveau-Brunswick.
Tel: 613-947-8011
Fax: 613-947-8013

Lovelace Nicholas, Sandra M. LIB (NB)
smithc@sen.parl.gc.ca
The Senate of Canada, Ottawa, Ont. K1A 0A4
Tel: 613-943-3635
Fax: 613-943-3637

Mockler, Percy CONS (St.Leonard)
The Senate of Canada, Ottawa, Ont. K1A 0A4
Tel: 613-947-4225
Fax: 613-947-4227

Ringuette, Pierrette LIB (NB)
ringup@sen.parl.gc.ca
The Senate of Canada, Ottawa, Ont. K1A 0A4
Tel: 613-943-2248
Fax: 613-943-2245

Robichaud, Fernand LIB (NB)
The Senate of Canada, Ottawa, Ont. K1A 0A4
Tel: 613-943-0675
Fax: 613-943-0677

Wallace, John D. CONS (NB)
The Senate of Canada, Ottawa, Ont. K1A 0A4
Tel: 613-947-4240
Fax: 613-947-4252

Labels: , , ,

Monday, November 03, 2008

Call for proposals: "Capturing our History: Feminisms in Canada and Quebec 1960-2010"

Capturing our History: Feminisms in Canada and Quebec, 1960-2010 /
Retracer notre histoire : le mouvement féministe au Canada et au Québec, 1960 à 2010


The project:
To publish a series of books - one per year beginning in 2010 - that depict the richness and diversity of feminist activity in Canada and Quebec between 1960 and 2010. They will be written by different authors and may include autobiographies, biographies, single- and multi-themed volumes, edited collections, plays, novels, etc.

The complexities of gender, race, class, geography, culture, dis/ability, language, sexual identity and age are central to the project. The topics may include:
· history of feminist groups (local, regional, national, service, topical etc.),
· autobiographies/ memoirs/ biographies of individuals involved in the movement,
· feminism in politics and the public service,
· feminists in business, the professions, the workplace, unions,
· feminism in art and sports,
· feminism in social and human sciences,
· feminism in reproductive issues and health,
· feminism in education, religion, science, international affairs,
· feminism and the media, etc.

We expect that all books will be published in both hardcover and paperback and intend to make some or all of the books available in digital format on the internet. The hardcover “collection” will be marketed as a series, like a “book of the year club.” We hope to sign up thousands as members of "Our Feminist History Book Society", a built-in purchasing group for the books, who for an annual fee of $75-100, would receive the “book of the year.” The paperback books will be sold separately in bookstores and outlets.


How to Participate:
Comment on how the project should be developed; propose writing a book, or part of one: M. Elizabeth Atcheson meatcheson@sympatico.ca
or Constance Backhouse backhous@uottawa.ca
or you can contact the NB Advisory Council on Status of Women for more info at acswcccf@gnb.ca

Who Is Involved:
The project is in formation and has benefited from the assistance of: Marguerite Andersen, M. Elizabeth Atcheson (Co-Editor), Constance Backhouse (Co-Editor), Monique Bégin, Mary Breen, Susan G. Cole, Margaret Conrad, Shelagh Day, Francine Descarries, Margrit Eichler, Ursula Franklin, Lorraine Greaves, Sylvia D. Hamilton, Danielle Juteau, Linda Kealey, Michele Landsberg, Tracey Lindberg, Meg Luxton, Diana Majury, Lorna Marsden, Maureen O’Neil, Francine Pelletier and Judy Steed.


hahaa

Labels: , , , ,

Tuesday, September 09, 2008

Something from Nothing: from Republican Barracudas to God Particles

When bad news abounds, I like to find solace in particle physics (no, not quantum of solace—blech).

First the bad news: North America enjoys paternalizing, destroying, saving, and sexualizing women politicians (watch out, this Globe article is accompanied by an image of the front page that refers to Sarah Palin as a "Republican Barracuda”--Wow).

Also, apparently the province of NB has decided to appeal the ruling made in August allowing Morgentaler “standing” to launch a court battle to force NB Dept of Health do its job—provide free and accessible abortions to women who need them. Morgentaler hasn’t actually sued the province yet, because first he must prove his right, as a man, to represent the women of NB. The Province will apparently stop at nothing to prevent proper access, and continues to insult the women of this province.

With Palin, no matter how much I abhor her politics, it still infuriates me to see the simultaneous demonization and sexualization of her by so many media outlets; the media spin on her ultra-conservative anti-feminist
politics as being feminist; the assumption that women can be duped by a skirt; and the focus on her appearance. My quick google search of her name says it all:


The Good news: we’re close to discovering how to go from nothing to something.

Higgs boson (otherwise known as the “God particle”) is a hypothetical “massive scalar elementary particle” predicted to exist by particle physics (first theorized in 1964). Hypothetical as in, it has yet to be observed. This is where the Large Hadron Collider at CERN comes in. Basically, observing the Higgs boson particle would help explain how massless elementary particles somehow construct mass in matter—the difference between the massless photon and bosons with mass.
To be clear: How did the big bang happen? How do you go from nothing to something, from zero mass to particles/matter with mass. These are the thoughts that used to keep me up at night, clutching the bedcovers to keep from spilling out into space.

This brings us to CERN, where the Large Hadron Collider is housed. The LHC is in a circular tunnel 27 km in circumference. The tunnel is buried about 100 metres underground between the Swiss and French borders on the outskirts of Geneva.

According to the official Large Hadron Collider website, the goal of the experiment is “to smash protons moving at 99.999999% of the speed of light into each other and so recreate conditions a fraction of a second after the big bang”. Based on the results, the LHC experiments will try and map out what happened.
Though some people believe that colliding high speed protons in an underground circle of life will spark the bang to end all bangs, CERN continues to issue press releases to allay all fears.

The researchers at CERN (the birthplace of the WorldWideWeb (though not the Internet per se) thanks to Tim Berners-Lee) will be flipping the “switch” on the LHC tomorrow September 10th, circulating the first high energy beams, after months of preparatory actions. The first collisions at high energy are expected to happen about a month from tomorrow.

So, tomorrow the countdown is on to discovering how it all began on a micro and macro level simultaneously.

In case my explanation is too banal (or just plain wrong), here’s a thorough rap explaining all.

Large Hadron Collider:



Sweet Dreams!

Labels: , , , ,

Monday, August 04, 2008

Bill C-543 a welcome alternative to Unborn Victims of Crime Act (C-484)

ARCC has just posted this brief explaining why the newly proposed members Bill C-543, “an Act to amend the Criminal Code (abuse of pregnant women) is a much better option than the existing Unborn Victims of Crime Bill, which opens legal pathways to affirm the personhood of a fetus (against the Supreme Court ruling that woman and fetus are one person) and punishing women/doctors who seek/perform abortions. I've already written about this problematic anti-choice bill here.

The last paragraph of the brief compares the goals of the two bills perfectly:
"Bill C-543 protects women, which was the stated goal of C-484, but it does not grant personhood to fetuses, which was the true goal of C-484. Anyone [who continues to] support C-484 instead of C-543 needs to acknowledge that they are not, and have never been, primarily interested in protecting pregnant women from abuse."

Labels: , , ,

Friday, June 13, 2008

Excerpts from PM's Apology to First Nations People

See also:
Video of PM Apology
Indian Residential Schools Truth and Reconciliation Commission
Indian and Northern Affairs info on resolutions.


Excerpts from Harpers' Apology:
(More on what this means later)


Mr. Speaker, I stand before you today to offer an apology to former students of Indian residential schools. The treatment of children in Indian residential schools is a sad chapter in our history.

In the 1870's, the federal government, partly in order to meet its obligation to educate aboriginal children, began to play a role in the development and administration of these schools.

Two primary objectives of the residential schools system were to remove and isolate children from the influence of their homes, families, traditions and cultures, and to assimilate them into the dominant culture.

These objectives were based on the assumption aboriginal cultures and spiritual beliefs were inferior and unequal.

Indeed, some sought, as it was infamously said, "to kill the Indian in the child."

Today, we recognize that this policy of assimilation was wrong, has caused great harm, and has no place in our country.

Most schools were operated as "joint ventures" with Anglican, Catholic, Presbyterian or United churches.

The government of Canada built an educational system in which very young children were often forcibly removed from their homes, often taken far from their communities.

Many were inadequately fed, clothed and housed.

All were deprived of the care and nurturing of their parents, grandparents and communities.

First Nations, Inuit and Métis languages and cultural practices were prohibited in these schools.

Tragically, some of these children died while attending residential schools and others never returned home.

The government now recognizes that the consequences of the Indian residential schools policy were profoundly negative and that this policy has had a lasting and damaging impact on aboriginal culture, heritage and language.

While some former students have spoken positively about their experiences at residential schools, these stories are far overshadowed by tragic accounts of the emotional, physical and sexual abuse and neglect of helpless children, and their separation from powerless families and communities.

The legacy of Indian residential schools has contributed to social problems that continue to exist in many communities today. It has taken extraordinary courage for the thousands of survivors that have come forward to speak publicly about the abuse they suffered.

It is a testament to their resilience as individuals and to the strength of their cultures.

Regrettably, many former students are not with us today and died never having received a full apology from the government of Canada.

The government recognizes that the absence of an apology has been an impediment to healing and reconciliation.

Therefore, on behalf of the government of Canada and all Canadians, I stand before you, in this chamber so central to our life as a country, to apologize to aboriginal peoples for Canada's role in the Indian residential schools system.

To the approximately 80,000 living former students, and all family members and communities, the government of Canada now recognizes that it was wrong to forcibly remove children from their homes and we apologize for having done this.

We now recognize that it was wrong to separate children from rich and vibrant cultures and traditions, that it created a void in many lives and communities, and we apologize for having done this.

We now recognize that, in separating children from their families, we undermined the ability of many to adequately parent their own children and sowed the seeds for generations to follow, and we apologize for having done this.

We now recognize that, far too often, these institutions gave rise to abuse or neglect and were inadequately controlled, and we apologize for failing to protect you.

Not only did you suffer these abuses as children, but as you became parents, you were powerless to protect your own children from suffering the same experience, and for this we are sorry.

The burden of this experience has been on your shoulders for far too long.

The burden is properly ours as a government, and as a country.

There is no place in Canada for the attitudes that inspired the Indian residential schools system to ever again prevail.

You have been working on recovering from this experience for a long time and in a very real sense, we are now joining you on this journey.

The government of Canada sincerely apologizes and asks the forgiveness of the aboriginal peoples of this country for failing them so profoundly.

We are sorry.

In moving towards healing, reconciliation and resolution of the sad legacy of Indian residential schools, implementation of the Indian Residential Schools Settlement agreement began on September 19, 2007.

Years of work by survivors, communities, and aboriginal organizations culminated in an agreement that gives us a new beginning and an opportunity to move forward together in partnership.

A cornerstone of the settlement agreement is the Indian Residential Schools Truth and Reconciliation Commission.

This commission presents a unique opportunity to educate all Canadians on the Indian residential schools system.

It will be a positive step in forging a new relationship between aboriginal peoples and other Canadians, a relationship based on the knowledge of our shared history, a respect for each other and a desire to move forward together with a renewed understanding that strong families, strong communities and vibrant cultures and traditions will contribute to a stronger Canada for all of us.


Labels: , ,

Tuesday, March 11, 2008

Why the "Unborn Victims of Crime" Bill is a bad idea



How did it pass under my radar that Parliament passed Bill C-484 last week, just in time for International Women’s Day? This is big news. This is a big issue. Everyone should be talking about it. I’m not even going to get into the fact that the NDP allowed this to pass, and that Stephane Dion wasn’t even present to offer a “yea” or “nay”. Really, you care that much?

Bill C-484, the so-called “Unborn Victims of Crime Act” is a private member's bill from Conservative MP Ken Epp. Its stated purpose is to change the criminal code to ensure that someone who has harmed/murdered a pregnant woman is also accountable and punishable for the loss of the fetus.

On the surface, this may sound like a good idea. All murder is tragic and disapproved of, but the violent murder of a pregnant woman in particular, a culturally constructed symbol of purity, beauty, and life, is always taken by the public as one of the most abhorred tragedies. Everyone agrees this shouldn't happen, and I'm sure we've all imagined vigilante justice against those calmly arrogant husbands who deliver teary-eyed pleas to news crews, then lead the search party to the body three days later.

It is notable that Epp is an MP from Edmonton Sherwood. Edmonton saw two pregnant women murdered by their partners in the past two years. It is an issue that touches everyone in a community. However, MPs should be pushing preventative measures, not adding more punishment for crimes already committed. I haven't even gotten to the MAIN glaring problem with the bill:

Bill C-484 is a reactionary, anti-choice band-aid that will do NOTHING to curb the occurrence of domestic violence, or stop men from killing their pregnant partners. The Bill directly contravenes the current Supreme Court of Canada ruling that a woman and her fetus are considered “one person.” Not only is it an unproductive paper-based policy, it is sneakily and smugly worded using anti-choice terminology that allows Harper’s government to underhandedly legislate abortion (something Harper has promised not to do) without actually having to go through the process of overtly re-criminalizing it.

This Bill WILL NOT protect women from violence and murder.
It will only allow for loopholes to challenge a woman's constitutional right to terminate an unwanted pregnancy (a pregnancy that often further endangers her if she is in an abusive relationship).

It enforces already existing stratification of victims, adding pregnant/unpregnant to a list that differentiates “high-risk” women (i.e. sex workers), whose bodies currently dot both urban and rural wildernesses, from other women (you’re telling me that living with a violent/abusive man is not high-risk?). We do not need a valuation system that says a murderer should get less time for killing an unpregnant woman.

Before couching protectionism in anti-choice rhetoric, we need solid measures taken
- to ensure that women can escape abusive relationships,
- to ensure restraining orders are taken seriously and enforced,
- to maintain funding of shelters for women and children,
- and to provide resources to social aid workers/physicians, etc, to spot the signs of abuse and prevent the escalation of violence once a woman becomes pregnant (which is often when day-to-day abuse and bullying turns to violence).

Bill C-484 is meaningless without these measures.

(image source Prevention Ads)

“Pregnant and recently pregnant women are more likely to be victims of homicide than to die of any other cause, and evidence exists that a significant proportion of all female homicide victims are killed by their intimate partners.” source

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, March 04, 2008

NB next of kin rules relaxed: excellent news for common-law and same-sex couples

The New Brunswick Human Rights Commission announced Monday that all eight regional health authorities have agreed to allow a patient to give the person of their choice the power of attorney for personal care.

This action comes after a human rights complaint was filed in 2003, when a patient's same-sex partner was denied the ability to make decisions on his ill partner's behalf. Until 2000, NB common-law partners were also in the same illogical situation.

With the new process, a member of the NB Health Authority's quality and safety department will visit the patient in person, review the power of attorney, and oversee the signing of the appropriate documents.

It is so affirming to see changes being made that reflect the growing number of people who opt to form relationships outside the defined and legally approved roles.

See full Daily Gleaner article here


Labels: , ,

Wednesday, December 05, 2007

Teddy bear teacher pardoned, what about everyone else?


Gillian Gibbons, the British woman teaching in the Sudan who was sentenced to 40 lashes or 6 months in prison for allowing children in her class to name a teddy bear "Muhammad", has returned home to London:

"I'm just an ordinary middle-aged primary school teacher. I went out there to have an adventure, and got a bit more than I bargained for... "I don't think anyone could have imagined it would snowball like this."*

More than she bargained for? That's extremely generous of her.

Due to her Western privilege and connections, she has been able to leave, having served 15 days of jail-time. I'm thrilled that she will not be punished further, but I can't help think of all the other women in Islamic and Islamist states who are awaiting corporal punishment for their perceived "crimes".

*See Toronto Star's Teacher Safely Home After Teddy Bear Controversy



Labels: , ,

Saturday, November 10, 2007

Finally, an Independent (of Irving) paper in NB!

Aha! One small victory, hopefully the first of many.

Story Here

As reported in Halifax (I wonder what coverage has been like in NB? I remember hearing a snippet abotu this before I left for France.... has it been written up in our papers?).

CANADA: Upstart Paper Cracks Irving Media Monopoly
By Chris Arsenault

HALIFAX, Nov 7 (IPS) - For more than two years, the Irvings -- the 129th richest family in the world, with interests in energy, construction, forestry and transportation -- owned every single English language newspaper and magazine in the Canadian province of New Brunswick.

In 2006, a Canadian senate report called the Irving monopoly a "media-industrial complex that dominates the province."

That total dominance ended on Oct. 30, when, after a court overruled an Irving attempt to halt its publication, the first issue of the Carleton Free Press hit news stands.

"I'm just a guy who wants to serve his community," William Kenneth Langdon, the independent paper's publisher, told IPS. But observers around New Brunswick are casting Langdon and his newspaper as a symbol of something more powerful.

"David fought Goliath and David won," said Erin Steuter, a professor at Mount Saint Allison University who has studied New Brunswick's media monopoly. "The Irvings lost this latest battle about crushing the alternative publication," Dr. Steuter told IPS.

The battle over the Carleton Free Press started on Sep. 27, when a team of four forensic accountants hired by CanadaEast News Inc., a media holding company owned by the Irving family, barged into Langdon's home in Woodstock, New Brunswick, a small town of about 5,300 people.

Under a little known criminal code provision related to industrial espionage, the private agents scoured Langdon's residence. "They even rooted through my wife's lingerie drawer," Langdon told IPS.

Days before the search, citing a poor relationship with his immediate supervisor, Langdon had resigned his post as publisher of the Bugle-Observer, a paper owned by the Irvings, where he had worked for four years. In his resignation letter, Langdon expressed his intent to start a new paper.

"During my last weeks in the employ of the Irvings, I consulted with a lawyer who advised me that I had grounds for a constructive dismissal suit," wrote Langdon in the Carleton Free Press' first editorial. "Subsequently I sent to my home files that I could use as part of that suit."

The Irvings allege those files contained confidential commercial information. They were able to secure a court injunction to search Langdon's home while attempting to block the publication of the Carleton Free Press.

Victor Mlodecki, vice president of Brunswick News Inc. and Langdon's former boss, issued a statement in early October saying that the Irvings welcome competition in the newspaper business.

On Nov. 2, Justice Peter Glennie of the province's top court blocked the Irvings' request to halt the publication the Carleton Free Press, while prohibiting Langdon from using confidential Brunswick News information.

The new competition was welcomed by some unlikely sources. "In this province, the Irvings are connected to their monopoly in the forestry sector," Jeannot Volpe, leader of New Brunswick's Conservative Party, the official opposition, told IPS.

"I've been to events concerning this sector with hundreds of people which no one from the Irving papers covered. People are starting to get frustrated: how is our voice going to be heard if the media won't report the message?" said Volpe, whose party normally takes the side of big business.

The Irving family's fortune is valued at 5.9 billion dollars and its 300 companies directly employ eight percent of New Brunswick's 750,000 residents, according to figures from Kim Kierans, director of the journalism school at the University of King's College in Halifax. The Irving companies are private firms, rather than publicly traded companies, so their internal information isn't reported.

"The whole idea of freedom of the press implies that media are a check on powerful economic interests," Isabel Macdonald, the communications director for the New York-based media watch group Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting, told IPS. "When the media are incorporated into a powerful monopoly, it's very disturbing."

While media rights activists are hopeful about the Carleton Free Press, Irving still dominates the province's public sphere. The company has big plans in the works, including a seven-billion-billion dollar oil refinery and a new liquefied natural gas facility and pipeline in the city of Saint John.

These mega-projects have raised the ire of environmentalists who say the province should be decreasing rather than increasing its production of greenhouse gases. "There is no credible reporting by anyone who understands the science behind these proposals," said Inka Milewski, science advisor to the Conservation Council of New Brunswick.

"There is no credible capacity of any Irving media outlets to cover these stories," Milewski told IPS.

"Media concentration is worse in Canada than in other industrialised countries -- and in New Brunswick, way worse," Robert Picard, a U.S. media economics expert, told a 2003 conference in Moncton, New Brunswick.

According to 2003 figures from Enn Raudsepp, head of Concordia University's journalism programme in Montreal, 84 percent of Canadian media is owned by five companies.

As of 2005, one company, CanWest Global, owned by the Asper family, accounted for 28.5 percent of total daily newspaper circulation in Canada.

HERE Magazine, a tabloid style weekly, was New Brunswick's sole independent English language publication up until 2004, when the Irvings opened a competing "alternative" weekly called the Metro Marquee. While HERE had been publishing successfully for four years, the independent publication couldn't compete with the ad rates of the new Irving competitor and HERE's owners were forced to sell out to the monopoly rather than face financial ruin.

The Irvings closed down the Marquee upon purchasing HERE and changed the paper from a staff-driven organisation to a freelance model, with most writers receiving 25 dollars per article.

On Oct. 18, HERE Magazine, an Irving owned weekly which bills itself as "New Brunswick's Urban Voice", ran a cover story titled "Why not choose natural gas?" HERE normally requires its cover stories to be at least 1,000 words; the natural gas cover clocked in at 302. The article, which reads like a press release from a natural gas company, ran without listing its author, which also violates the magazine's normal guidelines.

"The Irvings sometimes just run press releases as their own stories," said Dr. Steuter. With citizens debating the merits of Irving's proposed natural gas pipeline, Steuter doubts the story was a coincidence.

"Time and time again we have seen that the media are really not very good at reporting on their corporate owners," said F.A.I.R.'s Isabel Macdonald. "If the corporate owners are the biggest player in the province's economy, that's a real problem from the standpoint of the public's right to know."


Labels: , ,

Saturday, October 13, 2007

ho no mo: NYC councillors propose ban on degrading words

The Following is a document submitted by New York City Councillors, it has not yet been approved. Symbolic, un-enforcable... but still worth proposing?

Resolution calling for a symbolic moratorium on pejorative use of the “b” word and the word “ho.”

By Council Members Mealy, Avella, Comrie, Dickens, Fidler, Foster, Jackson, Gentile, James, Liu, Mendez, Monserrate, Nelson, Reyna, Sanders Jr., Stewart, Vann and Vacca



Whereas, The Council of the City of New York strongly believes in promoting the equality of all of City residents and strives to foster an environment free from discrimination; and

Whereas, Acknowledging the great power of the spoken and written word, a power both immediate in its ability to inspire action and subtle in its far-reaching repercussions, the Council of the City of New York, responding to the concerns of constituent groups and the calls of civic leaders, seeks to join the national conversation about the appropriateness of pejorative use of terms like “bitch” and “ho;” and

Whereas, The Council believes that the repercussions of words can be constructive or can be insidious, and that words, when misused, can lay foundations to legitimize the illegitimate and codify the unthinkable, including, for example, the concept that it is acceptable to refer to women as animals or, worse, that women are these words used to describe them; and

Whereas, The Council recognizes that the word “bitch,” primarily defined by the American Heritage Dictionary as “female canine animal, especially a dog,” carries a legitimately non-pejorative definition, but the Council further recognizes that in 1811, Francis Grose, in his “Dictionary of the Vulgar Tongue,” described “bitch” as “A she dog, or doggess; the most offensive appellation that can be given to an English woman, even more provoking than that of whore,” thus documenting a long-standing tradition of the word’s use for purposes of degradation; and

Whereas, The word “ho” is commonly used to refer to a whore or woman of loose sexual reputation; and

Whereas, The Council feels grave concern at the derogatory use of the words “bitch” and “ho” in popular music, and wishes to express particular interest in working together with music industry executives to promote an atmosphere of professional responsibility and public accountability; and

Whereas, While some artists such as Queen Latifah make use of words like “bitch” and “ho” in contexts of strength and power, arguing “Everytime I hear a brother call a girl a bitch or a ho/Trying to make a sister feel low/You know all of that gots to go,” even such reference is an incommensurate response to the verbal assaults of the words employed by artists such as 50-Cent, Eminem, R. Kelly, Snoop Dogg, Juvenile, Lil’ Kim, Foxy Brown, and Bow Wow, as well as the late Tupac Shakur and the Notorious B.I.G.; and

Whereas, Calling “bitch,” “ho,” and the N-word “extreme curse words,” Hip-Hop mogul and Def Jam label co-founder Russell Simmons has called upon record executives to eradicate those words from their industry; and

Whereas, Simmons, joining together with fellow Hip-Hop Summit Action Network Co-Chair Dr. Benjamin Chavis, issued a statement reading, “Our internal discussions with industry leaders are not about censorship. Our discussions are about the corporate social responsibility of the industry to voluntarily show respect to African-Americans and other people of color, African-American women and to all women in lyrics and images;” and

Whereas, The words “bitch” and “ho” are used in popular media other than Hip-Hop music in contexts just as insulting and cruel; and

Whereas, The Council believes that the use of this hateful language creates for all women a paradigm of shame and indignity, a paradigm equally applicable to every woman regardless of whether she is the direct target of such attacks or a tangential but equally impacted victim; now, therefore, be it

Resolved, The Council of the City of New York calls for a symbolic moratorium on pejorative use of the “b” word and the word “ho.”

BRS
LS# 3000
5.29.07

Original Document can be found here

Labels: , ,

Friday, October 12, 2007

Canadian Dimension: Radical Campaign Suggestions for upcoming election

Visit Canadian Dimension magazine online to view the following articles:

Election Primer: Platform for a New Canada

In the absence of a radical program to campaign around for the upcoming federal election, Canadian Dimension suggests one.

12-Step Program to Combat Climate Change

We can have economic growth and decent living standards for all, so long as we develop the economy in harmony with the environment, with only a subordinate role for the market, write Cy Gonick and Brendan Haley.

Canada and World Order After the Wreckage

Imagining an alternate global politics could hardly be more pressing, says Greg Albo. Its success will depend upon social-justice movements agitating and demonstrating tirelessly, and building organizational capacities.

An Energy Security Program for Canada

Until Canada gets a “Mexican exemption” and exits NAFTA’s energy-proportionality clause, there is little chance of Canada fulfilling its modest, international Kyoto targets, let along going far beyond them, writes Gordon Laxer.

A Democratic Tax Reform for Canada

The two important functions of the tax system in a flourishing democracy are to raise revenue to fund government programs and to redistribute income and wealth. The Canadian tax system fails dismally in achieving both of these objectives, says Neil Brooks.

Toward a New Policy Paradigm for First Peoples

Peter Kulchyski writes that a new policy paradigm for First Peoples needs to be based on a substantive application of Aboriginal and treaty rights.

Ideas for Popular Assemblies

Can popular, community-based assemblies, which would bring various movements together into a democratic and permanent structure, become the first step toward building a larger project? asks Sam Gindin. Are popular assemblies the way to link these local structures into social forces of regional and national significance?


Labels: ,

Friday, October 05, 2007

Outrageous: US places peace activists on international criminal database-- denied entry to Canada

From the CODEPINK website:


Women Barred: Canada Refuses Entry to CODEPINK Cofounder Medea Benjamin and Retired Colonel Ann Wright
Contact: Medea Benjamin 415-235-6517 or Ann Wright 808-741-1141

October 3rd, 2007

Two well-respected US peace activists, CODEPINK and Global Exchange cofounder Medea Benjamin and retired Colonel and diplomat Ann Wright, were denied entry into Canada today (Wednesday, October 3). The two women were headed to Toronto to discuss peace and security issues at the invitation of the Toronto Stop the War Coalition. At the Buffalo-Niagara Falls Bridge they were detained, questioned and denied entry. They will hold a press conference on Thursday afternoon in front of the Canadian Embassy in Washington DC to ask the Canadian government to reverse its policy of barring peaceful protesters.

The women were questioned at Canadian customs about their participation in anti-war efforts and informed that they had an FBI file indicating they had been arrested in acts of non-violent civil disobedience.

WHEN: Thursday, October 4th at 1pm
WHERE: Canadian Embassy, 501 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington DC

"In my case, the border guard pulled up a file showing that I had been arrested at the US Mission to the UN where, on International Women's Day, a group of us had tried to deliver a peace petition signed by 152,000 women around the world," says Benjamin. "For this, the Canadians labeled me a criminal and refused to allow me in the country."

"The FBI's placing of peace activists on an international criminal database is blatant political intimidation of US citizens opposed to Bush administration policies," says Colonel Wright, who was also Deputy US Ambassador in four countries. "The Canadian government should certainly not accept this FBI database as the criteria for entering the country."

Both Wright and Benjamin plan to request their files from the FBI through the Freedom of Information Act and demand that arrests for peaceful, non-violent actions be expunged from international records.

"It's outrageous that Canada is turning away peacemakers protesting a war that does not have the support of either US or Canadian citizens," says Benjamin. "In the past, Canada has always welcomed peace activists with open arms. This new policy, obviously a creature of the Bush administration, is shocking and we in the US and Canada must insist that it be overturned.

Four members of the Canadian Parliament--Peggy Nash, Libby Davies, Paul Dewar and Peter Julian-- expressed outrage that the peace activists were barred from Canada and vow to change this policy.

Interviews available on request.

Labels: , ,

Thursday, September 13, 2007

Harper's Government Votes against Aboriginals (big surprise)

Canada votes Against UN Declaration on Aboriginal Rights....

The "Non-Binding" declaration was in fact passed in a vote of 143 to four. Can you guess the four countries that voted AGAINST a declaration in support of Aboriginal Rights? Easy. Those who are most afraid of losing natural resources and land: Canada, US, Australia, New Zealand.

As is typical, "significant concerns with respect to the wording of the current text" was cited as the reason Canada wouldn't support the declaration.

It's amusing and disappointing that even though the declaration is acknowledged as "non-binding" (at least in Macleans), those four governments are still having none of it. The declaration, as with most UN projects, is mostly symbolic, as a matter of good faith. The UN has policies on issues of equality, access to health care, access to education, elimination of violence and sexual assault, etc. These are symbolic gestures, and the issues they address will probably never come close to being truly dealt with on a massive scale. Are the governments of the four opposing nations really that numb? Can they not see this as a positive PR opportunity?

Canada respects its aboriginal population, read all about it!

Nope. Not a chance. No one cares about aboriginal issues anyway, unless you're aboriginal yourself, right?....
Oh Harper.

extry extry

Labels: , ,

Wednesday, August 08, 2007

Talk about Smart Mobs: Free Tibet activists use online technology to ensure message gets out

Howard Reingold talks about Smart Mobs in current activism: the use of cell phones and the internet to organize actions, communicate with group members, and to disseminate info to the media. smart mobs, smart mobiles.

I am sooo impressed by the techno-savvy group of activists that unfurled a banner at the Great Wall of China this week, and who were subsequently arrested.

Some background first:
Today a third Canadian, Lhadon Tethong, director of Students for a Free Tibet, has been arrested, along with her colleague Paul Golding. Six activists were arrested on Tuesday, including two Canadians: Sam Price and Melanie Raoul from Vancouver.

It was Sam and Melanie who rapelled down the Great Wall to hang a large banner that read, in English and Mandarin, "One World, One Dream, Free Tibet 2008". Tuesday marked the one-year countdown to the Beijing Olympics, and the group used the Olympic slogan to draw attention to China's occupation of Tibet.

What is so amazing about this action is the use of the internet to achieve global coverage, and as a means of keeping in touch while waiting to be detained by Chinese authorities.

An activist recorded the hanging of the banner on their cell phone and e-mailed the file to New York, where it was immediately uploaded to Youtube, and soon after was reported on in print and television media.

Since Tuesday, Lhadon Tethong (who was not present at the Great Wall action) has been travelling in Beijing where she has been a one-woman techno-firestorm:
- she has been blogging about the action at Beijing Wide Open
- To try and reach International Olympics Committee president Jacques Rogge, she posted a letter to him on her blog, then made a video of her talking about the letter while standing under a statue of Mao Tse-Tung. She then called the IOC to tell them about the video on her blog, then made a video of the call and added that to the blog. An IOC staffer agreed to meet with her.
- She talked with CTV news about the action via satellite, and posted this video on the blog as well

I just visited the blog, where a video has been posted of a Skype video-call Lhadon and Paul made at an internet cafe yesterday, before their imminent arrest. [Skype is a free web-based phone service].

What excellent use of these resources, these web-based technologies, for social action! I think today I'll be able to work on my thesis after all.


CBC article

Labels: , , , ,

Tuesday, July 24, 2007

Catholic Hospital Merger would end reproductive health services

July 23, 2007 • For immediate release

Abortion Rights Coalition of Canada / Coalition pour le Droit à l’Avortement au Canada
______________________________

COMMUNITY RISES UP AGAINST CATHOLIC HOSPITAL MERGER THAT WOULD END REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH SERVICES

TORONTO — A community is up in arms after two neighbouring hospital boards voted in June to amalgamate the secular Huronia District Hospital in Midland Ontario, and the neighbouring Roman Catholic Penetanguishene General Hospital. The merger would end several essential health services, including abortions, vasectomies, tubal ligations, and birth control options. The proposed merger, which has yet to be voted on by the hospital membership, was recommended mostly for economic reasons, as Huronia suffers from a $5 million dollar deficit while the Catholic hospital has a surplus.

At a packed public forum in Midland on July 19 to oppose the merger, over 500 members of the community showed up, including Huronia Hospital physicians, several Huronia board members who had resigned from the board in opposition, three mayors from nearby towns, politicians, and representatives from the Ontario Nurses Association, several unions, and pro-choice groups.

Carolyn Egan of the Abortion Rights Coalition of Canada (ARCC-CDAC) told the crowd how critically important it was to maintain a full range of reproductive health services, including abortion, since the loss of such services hurts the community as a whole. She noted that many at the forum expressed dismay that Catholic religious doctrine might be imposed on an entire community.

“The overwhelming support from ordinary citizens for the pro-choice position was incredibly gratifying,” said Egan. “Women who used to be active in the pro-choice movement, some going back thirty years, came up and spoke to me. Also, young women in the community are providing support and leadership in the campaign, which is great to see.”

Every single doctor at the Huronia Hospital has come out against the merger. So far, local groups and volunteers have managed to sign up over 1000 new hospital members who plan to vote against the proposed merger. The energetic
campaign has attracted national media attention. “I am delighted that this struggle is now getting national coverage because it clearly has implications for women across the country,” said Egan. “This local campaign highlights the issue of health care cutbacks and hospital reorganizations, and their effects on reproductive health. Abortion clinics serve many of the needs in urban areas, but in rural parts of the country, women really depend on hospital abortions.”

“The planned merger undermines the right of Canadians to access health care under the Canada Health Act,” said Joyce Arthur, another ARCC-CDAC spokesperson. “A hospital can’t be allowed to withdraw essential medical services simply because it needs to clear a debt. We’re 100% behind this campaign to fight the merger, and want to congratulate the Midland community for its inspiring work.”

Carolyn Egan, Ontario Coalition for Abortion Clinics, Toronto, 416-806-7985
Joyce Arthur, Pro-Choice Action Network, Vancouver, 604-351-0867
Judy Burwell, former director of the Morgentaler Clinic, Fredericton,
506-470-9049
Catherine Megill, ARCC-CDAC, Montréal (Elle parle français), 514-486-9669
Dr. Suzanne Newman, Abortion provider, Women's Hospital, Health Sciences
Centre; Women's Health Clinic Abortion Services, Winnipeg, 204-477-1887

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, June 19, 2007

Atlantica Protester


i love this idea.

http://maritimes.indymedia.org/

Labels: , ,

Sunday, June 10, 2007

New SWC Program guidelines are out, fists are up.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
JUNE 6, 2006

NDP MP OUTRAGED AT CHANGES TO WOMEN’S PROGRAM

OTTAWA – This week, the minister responsible for Status of Women Canada, Bev Oda, released the new funding mandate for the Women’s Program. Despite opposition from women’s groups, the new mandate severely restricts women’s organizations and completely ignores the recommendations of the Standing Committee on the Status of Women.

“This Conservative government didn’t listen to women and has officially removed equality from the mandate and eliminated any research or advocacy funding. This is an assault on the women’s movement in Canada,” said Irene Mathyssen, Status of Women critic for the NDP. “This government is side-stepping its role and forcing organizations to find funding from outside sources before committing any federal funding. This leads to organizations depending on charity, not merit, for funding.”

To be eligible for funding under the new mandate, organizations must have proof of another source of funding in writing. Organizations are also restricted from applying for funding for research, lobbying, and pre-existing programs.

“These restrictions make it impossible for organizations to plan, or to engage in any long-term projects,” said Mathyssen. “There is no room for capacity building, there is no core funding. If this government were truly interested in addressing women’s rights they would invest in core funding for programs that work to eliminate women’s inequality in Canada.“

“We are now taking steps backward on equality rights instead of forward,” said Mathyssen. “By shutting offices, changing the mandate and cutting funding, Bev Oda is not promoting women’s rights. The Conservative Government is not committed to promoting women’s equality,” continued Mathyssen. “They are abandoning women in this country.”

See also this previous post on the Status of Women council for background info. or this essay timeline of events.

Labels: , ,

Wednesday, June 06, 2007

Housing Takeover: Women Against Poverty Collective Toronto


About 150 members of the Women Against Poverty Collective (WPAC) plus supporters took to the streets in Toronto earlier on Sunday to take part in an anti-poverty demonstration.

Saying their demands for safe, affordable housing for women have been ignored for too long, members of the group entered the abandoned house at 4 Howard St.

Once inside the home, the women hung a banner and pitched tents on the property, saying they will keep the building and provide their own affordable housing for women and their children.

"We are children of survivors, we are survivors, we are friends of survivors of violence and poverty," one protester shouted through a megaphone from a window. "For too long we've had to witness our mothers, our sisters, our friends live through violence."

The group says this action is necessary because the provincial and federal governments haven't followed through on promises for housing and childcare.

"This is necessary because those who are trying to leave violence are stuck in shelters for months instead of the few weeks they should be there with their kids," said protest organizer Anna Willats.

From CTV news.





A parallel march and occupation occured in Vancouver on the weekend in solidarity with the Toronto event.

Images from SmugMug

Labels: , ,